Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Atlantic St. Heritage Associates, LLC v. Bologna, 204 Conn. App. 163 (2021)

Citation
Atlantic St. Heritage Associates, LLC v. Bologna, 204 Conn. App. 163 (2021)
Parent Document
Atlantic St. Heritage Associates, LLC v. Bologna, 204 Conn. App. 163 (2021)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2021-04-27

Full Text

2,258 chars
The plaintiff sought, by way of summary process, to regain possession of
   certain premises occupied by the defendant. The trial court granted the
   plaintiff’s motion for default for failure to plead and rendered a judgment
   of possession in favor of the plaintiff. The following day, the defendant
   filed a motion to open the judgment, which the court denied one week
   later. Notice of the court’s decision denying the motion to open issued
   two days after that, and the defendant appealed that same day. There-
   after, the plaintiff filed a motion to terminate the appellate stay, which
   sought, in substance, a determination that there was not, in fact, an
   appellate stay in effect because the defendant had not filed his appeal
   within the five day statutory (§ 47a-35) appeal period in summary process
   actions and that the filing of the motion to open did not extend the
   appeal period. The defendant filed an objection, arguing that the case
   was controlled by Young v. Young (249 Conn. 482). Following a hearing,
   the court determined that no appellate stay was in effect that would
   prevent the execution of the judgment of possession during the pendency
   of the appeal. The defendant thereafter filed a timely motion for review
   with this court. Held that the case was controlled by Young, and, there-
   fore, the defendant’s appeal was timely and, pursuant to § 47a-35 (b),
   execution of the judgment of possession was stayed until the final
   determination of the cause: because the defendant filed his motion to
   open well within the five day appeal period and, pursuant to the applica-
   ble rule of practice (§ 63-1 (c) (1)), a motion to open is a motion that,
   if granted, would render the judgment ineffective, a new five day appeal
   period arose when notice of the court’s decision denying the motion to
   open issued, and the defendant filed his appeal on that same day, well
   within the new appeal period; accordingly, the defendant’s motion for
   review and the relief requested therein were granted, and the trial court’s
   order on the plaintiff’s motion to terminate the appellate stay was
   vacated.
         Considered March 17—officially released April 27, 2021 Procedural History