Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Citation
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Parent Document
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1982-07-30
Other Sections in This Document (23)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
- Jason v. Jacobson, 438 N.E.2d 817 (1982)
Full Text
1,072 charsThe defendants requested a report of the rulings of law to the Appellate Division of the District Court Department, Northern District. See G. L. c. 231, § 108. Approximately twenty-two months later, the Appellate Division decided that G. L. c. 186, § 15B (7), provided only for double damages at the time the plaintiff filed her complaint (June 27, 1978). The case was remanded for a full new trial. The plaintiff filed a request for rehearing on the ground that no issue of fact was in dispute and, therefore, the judge should enter judgment for the plaintiff awarding double, rather than treble, damages. The Appellate Division denied the request because “the Appellate Division does not know what the trial judge found in the way of damages except that in making that determination he awarded treble damages and attorney’s fee by applying” G. L. c. 186, § 15B, as appearing in St. 1977, c. 979, § 1. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from the decision of the Appellate Division. We conclude that the appeal is not properly before us, and that it must be dismissed.