Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/383814_pub.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 383814_pub.pdf
Full Text
1,780 charsconflicts with the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA), thereby giving a plaintiff a benefit over other employees with more seniority, is an undue burden that is not required to be accommodated. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison, 432 U.S. 63, 79, 97 S. Ct. 2264, 53 L. Ed. 2d 113 (1977). 1 Ms. Suarez’s tort claim that the School violated public policy is founded on the public policy expressed in the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD), chapter 49.60 RCW. Because her statutory discrimination claim fails, so does her tort claim. For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 38381-4-III Suarez v. State—dissenting Here, the School has a CBA that provides employees two days off per year for religious purposes. The agreement, however, requires employees to request days off at least 14 days in advance. The apparent reason for this is to give the School sufficient time to find an employee to cover the missed shift and to permit the covering employee time to adjust their personal plans. A last minute request for days off not only inconveniences the School, it impacts employees who need to alter their personal plans. By April 2019, the School had permitted Ms. Suarez five days off for religious purposes, three more than permitted by the CBA. On September 8, 2019, Ms. Suarez requested four additional days off for religious purposes—September 28 and 29, and October 5 and 6. Her immediate supervisor had no authority to grant this request because Ms. Suarez had exceeded the two days permitted under the CBA. Her supervisor recommended Ms. Suarez make her request to the School superintendent. She failed to promptly do this. Instead, Ms. Suarez waited until September 27 and asked the